Dean Clancy is a favorite follow of mine. After I posted this last night, a list of articles that I am reading through on the MacArthur-Meadows amendment, I read Dean’s Twitter Timeline where he posted a link to Chris Jacobs’ article
And this morning on the Glenn Beck Radio Program, Mark Sandford of South Carolina gave a fabulous interview touching on a few subjects including the current not-a-Full Repeal situation. It just finished so as soon as it is available I will post it because it was truly an impressive interview.
In the end it never goes well for Republicans to compromise. So why are they doing it with the AHCA today?
In the beginning “they” voted for the 2015 Repeal Bill but “they” chose to ignore that same bill again in 2017 on Day 1 of the Trump presidency. “They” cried Full Repeal in the beginning but Speaker Ryan, behind closed doors with NO conservative input, thrusted the AHCA-Hell bill on the Congress in March 2017.
The rumors of a compromise, or caving-in, have been swirling since the Freedom Caucus kept Ryan’s original bill off the floor. A couple of private groups have been angered to enraged about the rumors, but today even more so about the MacArthur-Meadows amendment, the one that has yet to be voted on and fused into the AHCA.
My question, what happened to the clean, one sentence, FULL Repeal Bill?
Another question, what happens to the AHCA if more lines of whatever amendments get stacked into it? Do we have to wait for it to pass to see what is in it?
So here are the links I am going to read through, probably more than a few times, tonight and tomorrow to see how “they” #FrameTheDebate before I form an opinon on this next step to the not-full-repeal-and-hope-the-Senate-is-more-honest-in-full-repeal-than-the-wimpy-House-progressive-nightmare AHCA that requires the MacArthur-Meadows Amendment to be palatable.
~ I checked the CATO search engine but was unable to find anything current on the ammendment but there are some interesting reads on Healthcare should you care to check them out.